Wednesday, November 14, 2018

The Militia Acts and Firearms age restrictions.

While I believe that the Militia Acts are not Constitutional since Congress is not given the power to decide who or what the Militia are, only to organize the Militia, I will use that Act to demonstrate that all laws restricting the age to own a firearm violate the Militia clause and the ability of the government to organize, arm, and discipline the Militia. As per the Militia Act first set the ages for members as 18 to 45, later to 18 to 54. Thus all laws restricting arms bearing to those under 19 or even 21 in some states violate the necessity of 18 yr olds training with and bearing arms.

Thursday, July 26, 2018

Commander in Chief

Before I blow an artery, the President IS NOT the Commander in Chief of the United States. The President is Commander in Chief of the land and naval forces and the Militia when called into the use of the United States. STOP CALLING THE PRESIDENT THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF. HE'S NOT.

Monday, July 23, 2018

Screaming - oil is a fossil fuel

Of course crude oil is a hydrocarbon and according to the "experts" hydrocarbons come from processes that occur to living tissue upon death. BUT ... Where did the carbon come from BEFORE it was living tissue? Where did the dinosaurs or plants or algae get their carbon? Of course the answer is FROM THE ABIOTIC CARBON all over the Earth. Carbon does not originate from living organisms. Living organisms do not occur UNTIL after carbon has been created by abiotic processes. From where comes carbon? Two probable sources. 1) Carbon occurs following the fusion of three helium atoms, helium being formed from the fusion of hydrogen atoms. 2) Carbon is released as a fission product from the heavier radioactive materials in the core of the Earth and other planets. Carbon is ubiquitous in the Universe. Moons and planets in our solar system have carbon. Entire lakes of hydrocarbons exist on moons like Titan. Was life there in abundance, leaving behind the hydrocarbon lakes? Probably not. So where did the hydrocarbons come from? Abiotic processes such as when carbon and hydrogen undergo bonding under the requrieed temperatures and pressures is a plausible explanation. Being less dense than the surrounding other atoms and compounds, the low density substances move toward the surface being displaced by high density materials such as magma. We are always being told oil is running out. The fossil fuels are being depleted. Hell, if dinosaurs are responsible for the oil that is found, one asks, "How many dinos does it take to make a barrel of oil?" So I assume on the high side that a barrel weighs 500 lbs and that living animals have 5% carbon. This allows one to calculate that it takes 1 10,000 lb dino to leave behind sufficient carbon for each barrel of oil. We produce literally millions of barrels oil DAILY so there had to have been millions, no billions of 10,000 lb dinos to leave behind sufficient carbon to meet the amount of oil we have already extracted. Even over millions of years that required a LOT of giant dinos running around to supply the vast amount of carbon. So maybe there's an alternative explanation. Find Dr Thomas Gold's articles. American Scientist (Sigma Xi) published one around 1993. Heck just check out Russian and many other scientists who support tha abiotic oil paradigm.

Monday, April 10, 2017

The United States, the States, and the People - Three different entities of the Constitution

In the lines of the Constitution we find references to the United States, the States or the several States, and the People. Just what is meant and just what is encompassed by these terms we can elucidate from the various uses of each term in the Constitution. First, the United States. Most folks think of the USA as a nation, singular, but that is not the case. The Framers did not form a new nation, they formed a Union of nations, often called states. Throughout the Constitution the entity, the United States of America, is referred to in the plural, talking "their jurisdiction" (13th Amendment) or "any of them" Article III, Section 3 on treason. The idea that the USA is a nation and not that the USA ARE a Union is a modern invention created by a socialist attempting to destroy state sovereignty. Next, States. What are the States? They are the original political organizational groups who came together and created "the United States of America", the Union. The States are individual nations bound by an agreed to law, the Constitution. The States are different and apart from the United States and from the People. Last, the People. Who are the People? They are the sovereigns of the Earth, endowed with Rights from their Creator. They organize and form States, and through those States, the United States. Each of these governmental groups being subordinate to the People. Within the Constitution, each of these entities is referred separately. Grants of power are made to the United States from the States as agents of the People. Some restrictions on State powers are enumerated in the Constitution. Lastly Rights of the People and the final resting of power in the hands of the People is referenced. These distinctions are important because of some misunderstanding of the Constitution and some changes made that were improper. Look at the 17th Amendment. In it, the Senate is changed from being chosen by "the State" to being chosen by "the People". Some think there is no difference but the 10th Amendment tells a different story. The 10th tell us that the States and the People are distinct and different. The 17th Amendment thus takes away State suffrage in the Senate and moves the suffrage to the People. This means the 17th Amendment was never properly ratified because of the restriction in Article V wherein no State can be deprived of its suffrage in the Senate without its permission. The 17th had to have unanimous ratification to be legitimate. We can also look at the commerce power in Article I Section 8. The power is to regulate commerce among the States. The Constitution proves that States are separate from the People through how the terms are used. The power to regulate commerce is that wherein the States are involved in the commerce NOT the people/corporations/businesses. Why would this be? Because the Constitution was written in a manner to grant powers to the federal government in order to maintain the flow of commerce among the States, so that particular States would not interfere with other States. Note that it is not he power to regulate commerce among nations or among the Indian tribes. The power to regulate commerce does not touch upon regulating manufacturing, or regulating things, or even regulating vessels of transport. The power to regulate stages on the post roads was evaluated and not approved in the convention of 1787. The power over stages on the post roads was left to each state in which the post road ran. Why? Because the States would never give up power over their internal operations. Thus the terms, the United States of America, the States, and the People are independent but related body-politics. Each has its own realm of authority with the People being at the top, the States, the United States at the bottom, albeit with full delegated authority within the grants of power. All powers not delegated are withheld.

Saturday, April 08, 2017


Why have the courts and the president stolen powers? Because the people are brain-washed into believing the courts have great power. That the courts have the final say. But if one understands certain simple facts, one understands that the courts DO NOT have the final say, that the courts cannot legitimately interpret the Constitution. The Constitution was created by the people through our representative states. Thus the People are superior, are the Creator, of the Constitution. The Constitution is then the Creator of the government, all branches. The created, that is the branches of government, are subordinate to the Constitution, it is the rules, the laws that control the government. How then is it that the subordinate can decide or define the extent of the superior? How is it that the government created BY THE PEOPLE is authorized to decide what its own limits are, what the legal document that creates it does or does not say? The only way the created overpowers the Creator is through lies and corruption. The supreme court is not endowed with the legitimate authority to interpret or decide what the Constitution means. It cannot be because then the court would be superior to the Constitution that created it. We have been lied to and power has been stolen by these evil, corrupt judges who do not know their place. Blackstone covered it but folks today are too ignorant to study Blackstone and understand the position of government relative to the individual in a government derived through natural law. Blackstone: For whenever a question arises between the society at large and any magistrate vested with powers originally delegated by that society, it must be decided by the voice of the society itself: there is not upon earth any other tribunal to resort to. Sir William Blackstone, Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book I, Chp3, pg.205/6 The same goes with the liars and cheats who express the unitary executive theory and try to claim that the powers granted in the Constitution for the President are only examples. The powers granted in the Constitution are the sum total of all power granted. If it is not written it is not granted. No implied. No inherent. Tenth amendment. The President has 10 powers. His position is more akin to being head butler than anything else. All the other powers the President exercises have been usurped because the People are not educated about our system of government and the extreme limitations that were placed on the federal government by the Constitution. This subversion began with the 1st Congress and has continued every since. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Thursday, April 06, 2017

Reading list

Books I've read in my quest to know the Constitution for the United States of America: A New Birth of Freedom

Charles L Black, Jr.

A View of the Constitution of the United States of America

William Rawle

America's Constitution

Akil Reed Amar

Blackstone's Commentaries with notes of Reference to the Constitution of the Federal Government of the United States and the Commonwealth of Virginia: Volumes 1 through 5

St George Tucker

Breach of Trust

Tom Coburn

Cato's Letters: Volumes 1 & 2

Trenchard Gordan

Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States: Volumes 1, 2, & 3

Joseph Story, LLD

Commentaries on the Laws of England: Volumes 1 through 4

William Blackstone

Congress and the Supreme Court

Raoul Berger

Constitutional Chaos

Andrew Napolitano

Constitutional Faith

Sanford Levinson

Constitutional History

Thomas M Cooley

Democracy in America: Volumes 1 & 2

Alexis De Tocqueville

Discourses Concerning Government

Algernon Sidney

Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution:


John P Kaminski et al, Ed

Elliot's Debates on the Federal Constitution: Volumes 1 through 5

Jonathan Elliot

Executive Privilege: A Constitutional Myth

Raoul Berger

Fletcher of Saltoun: Andrew Fletcher

David Daiches, Ed.

Go Directly to Jail

Gene Healy

Good to be King

Michael Badnarik

Government by Judiciary

Raoul Berger

Gun Control and the Constitution Volumes 1, 2, 3

Robert Cottrell et al.

Hamilton's Curse

Thomas DiLorenzo

Impeachment: The Constitutional Problems

Raoul Berger

In Defense of Freedom and Related Essays

Frank Meyer

In Defense of the Constitution

George W Carey

Inventing Freedom

Daniel Hannan

It is a Constitution We are Expounding

Am. Const. Soc.

Lincoln Unmasked

Thomas DiLorenzo

Men in Black

Mark Levin

Moral Man and Immoral Society

Reinhold Niebuhr

On Reading the Constitution

Laurence H Tribe

Recapturing the Spirit: Essay on the Bill of Rights at 200

Eric Nesse

Tainted Truth: The Manipulation of Fact in America

Cynthia Crosse

That Every Man be Armed

Stephen P Halbrook

The 14th Amendment and the Bill of Rights

Raoul Berger

The Bill of Rights

Akil Reed Amar

The Bill of Rights and the States

Patrick Conley and John Kaminski

The Christian Life and Character of the Civil Institutions of the United States

B F Morris

The Constitution in Exile

Andrew Napolitano

The Constitution of the United States: A Critical Discussion of its Genesis, Development and Interpretation

John Randolph Tucker

The Constitutional Principles of Constitution Law in the United States of America

Thomas M. Cooley

The Cult of the Presidency

Gene Healy

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches

Bernard Bailyn, ed.

The Disuniting of America

Arthur N Schlesinger Jr

The End of America

Naomi Wolff

The Fiefdom Syndrome

Robert Herrold

The Great Rights of Mankind

Bernard Schwartz

The Growth of the Constitution

William Meigs

The Invisible Constitution

Laurence H Tribe

The Liberty Amendments

Mark Levin

The Life of General Stonewall Jackson

R L Dabney, DD

The Myth of Homeland Security

Marcus Ranum

The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States

Kent Hall, Ed.

The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution

Kevin R C Gutzman

The Real Lincoln

Thomas DiLorenzo

The Road to Serfdom

F A Hayek

The Roosevelt Myth

John T Flynn

The Story of Liberty

Charles C Coffin

The Supreme Court and the Constitution

Stanley Kutler

The Triumph of Nationalism

William P Murphy

The Tyranny of Good Intentions

Pail Craig Roberts and Lawrence M Stratton

The Vision of the Anointed

Thomas Sowell

The Writings of Thomas Jefferson: 15 Volumes

Thomas Jefferson

Three Felonies a Day

Harvey Silverglate

Two Treatises of Government

John Locke

Wealth of Nations

Adam Smith

Who Killed the Constitution?

Thomas E. Woods and Kevin R. C. Gutzman

Who Killed the Constitution?

William Eaton

Read these and then I'll be happy to consider your opinion.

Saturday, March 25, 2017

Why are folks so stupid about federal eminent domain or the actual lack thereof?

Within the entire document known as the Constitution for the United States of America and all its amendments, the concept of eminent domain appears --- no where. There is absolutely no grant for the federal government to exercise such a power as eminent domain in order to steal real property within the borders of any state or any where else for that matter. Some argue that eminent domain is an inherent power of a sovereign nation but the US are not a sovereign nation and under the standard of our Constitution all powers must be granted to the federal government. The US are a Union and the plurality of the entity known as the US is stated throughout the document in every reference to the United States, even in the 13th amendment. But beyond that, the jealousy of free and independent states left no room for any inherent powers as is expressed in the 10th amendment. And no the lack of the adverb, expressly, has no bearing as the verb, "granted", makes no implication as to inherent or implied power. To be granted, the power must be explicit so that all persons see the grant or it is not granted. It does not bear upon some magic persons, called judges, to determine the hidden parts of our Constitution when no hidden parts exist. At the time of the writing and ratification of the Constitution for the United States of America, the individual states were quite concerned with the loss of their own sovereignty, independence, and authority, In Article I Section 8, the power to obtain land within state borders was restricted to the purchase of land with the permission of the legislature of the state wherein the lands lie and then only for needful buildings. If the federal government held eminent domain for any reason, this grant of power is wholly moot and unnecessary. The states, being jealous of this new central government, withheld most power to act within state boundaries and the lack of a grant of eminent domain power is just one more area where the states withheld such an abusive power from the federal government.