Guess I'm a 2nd doomer because I recognize that all the problems surrounding the 2nd were caused BY the SCOTUS through erroneous decisions and thus have little belief the SCOTUS will properly correct all their errors by finally stating the 2nd says what it means and means what it says, no if, and or buts. The courts ARE the problem.
Logic should prevail. Latter law overrides prior law is a standard legal maxim which properly works when applied always and not haphazardly. The 2nd is latter law and according to the Preamble of the Bill of Rights, the ten passed amendments are 1) articles in addition to AND 2) amendments of the Constitution, which fits exactly with the concept of latter law overriding prior law. In this case, all delegated powers in the original Constitution that conflict with the simple, direct command of the 2nd are negated. No exceptions. No ifs, ands or buts.
Then were have the supremacy clause of Art 6 Sec 2 which places the 2nd over ALL state laws.
Next come fundmental law theory:
Fundamental Law Theory
"With this in mind, let us take a look at this essay with the
following in mind: the fundamental law theory is based in part
upon the proposition that the agencies it creates are subordinate
to it and must operate within its confines. To quote Hamilton
again, : 'To deny this proposition would be to affirm, that the
deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above
his master; that the representatives of the people are superior
to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers,
may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they
forbid.'"
In defense of the Constitution, Carey (1989)
FLT stops the courts in their tracks because the courts are subordinate to the Constitution and have not authority to interpret our law for them, the Constitution. The lie that the courts have the final has been inculcated in the people and most folks are incapable of clearing their minds of the brain-washing.
Adding words such as "allowing state permits", "sensitive places", "compelling government interest" violate the principles of the Constitution. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED leaves no room. The judges know this and yet fail to have sufficient cajones to state the facts. So doomer I am. The courts mucked it up and the courts have not yet corrected their screw ups because the courts do not want to give up power.
